22 April, 2006

replace Bush, Republicans, or Rumsfeld?

I read this today: "Rumsfeld should go because he invaded Iraq without a decent plan for the aftermath. ... Rumsfeld should go because ... U.S. troops brought unimaginable shame to our nation by torturing terrorist suspects in Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison and at Guantanamo Bay. ... Rumsfeld should go because he sent U.S. soldiers to war without equipping them sufficiently.
And Rumsfeld should be replaced because of the atmosphere he has created in the Pentagon, a stifling one that mirrors the worst tendencies of the Bush administration."

Replace the name Rumsfeld with these 'current republicans' and we have the real solution to the problem

No comments: